Youtube
· Lex Fridman
· general
Lex Fridman · Was the Roman Empire a military dictatorship? | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
- 1. The Byzantine Empire did not have a term in Greek that corresponds to the modern notion of 'empire'; they called it 'basileia' (monarchy) or 'politeia' (polity).
- 2. The Eastern Roman Empire is better described as a 'monarchic republic' because it was a polity governed by a monarch who was expected to serve the republic.
- 3. The Eastern Roman Empire was not a military dictatorship because the army was almost never used as an instrument of social control over the population.
- 4. The army's involvement in choosing emperors through civil wars did not make the state a military dictatorship, as the army did not impose its will on society at large.
- 5. The term 'empire' is conventionally misapplied to the Byzantine state, especially in its later period when it was a minor power with only a few islands.
- 6. Justinian was the only Byzantine emperor who used the army to suppress his own population, which was exceptional.