Article
· book: capital ideas
· finance
Capital Ideas — Chapter 7: The Search for High P.Q.
- 1. Eugene Fama, a third-generation Italian-American from Boston, consolidated knowledge about stock price behavior into a comprehensive theory explaining why prices appear to fluctuate randomly.
- 2. Fama's job with Harry Ernst involved finding buy-and-sell signals based on price momentum, but the rules only worked on old data, not new data.
- 3. Fama was urged by his Tufts professors to attend the University of Chicago for graduate school because he was 'more intellectual than the typical Harvard type.'
- 4. Fama taught the first graduate course at Chicago on Harry Markowitz's portfolio theory, despite Markowitz's work being virtually unknown in the finance department.
- 5. The Fisher-Lorie study (1964) measured total returns of all NYSE common stocks from 1926 to 1960, finding that $1,000 invested in 1926 grew to nearly $30,000 by 1960—a 9% annual return.
- 6. Edgar Lawrence Smith's 1924 study showed that stocks beat bonds hands down over long periods, influencing the bull market of the 1920s.
- 7. Fisher and Lorie asserted that an investor who selected stocks at random would, on average, end up with the same wealth as one who earned the market's average return.
- 8. Fama's 1965 article 'The Behavior of Stock Market Prices' concluded that stock prices are not predictable, and he challenged chartists to subject their theories to rigorous tests.
- 9. Fama argued that even skilled security analysts cannot consistently outperform random selection because the market is efficient: prices adjust 'instantaneously' to new information.
- 10. Fama coined the terms 'efficient market' and 'market efficiency' to describe a market where prices immediately reflect all available information, making trends unlikely.
- 11. Michael Jensen's 1969 study of 115 mutual funds over 1955-1964 found that, after adjusting for risk, the average fund underperformed a buy-and-hold strategy by 15%.
- 12. Warren Buffett's analogy of 215 million coin-tossers shows that a small number of consistent winners can emerge by chance, not skill.